<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palinesque</title>
	<link>http://blog.bbbeard.com/2008/09/10/palinesque/</link>
	<description>A Peculiar, Yet Refreshing, Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 11:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: bbbeard</title>
		<link>http://blog.bbbeard.com/2008/09/10/palinesque/#comment-33</link>
		<author>bbbeard</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.bbbeard.com/2008/09/10/palinesque/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Well, I would have fired Wooten, had I been his supervisor's supervisor's supervisor. But apparently none of this pressure happened. I gather that the real reason Monegan was encouraged to hit ladders.com was that he refused to play budget games according to the governor's rules. And that will get you fired anywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I would have fired Wooten, had I been his supervisor&#8217;s supervisor&#8217;s supervisor. But apparently none of this pressure happened. I gather that the real reason Monegan was encouraged to hit ladders.com was that he refused to play budget games according to the governor&#8217;s rules. And that will get you fired anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aurora_guy</title>
		<link>http://blog.bbbeard.com/2008/09/10/palinesque/#comment-32</link>
		<author>aurora_guy</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.bbbeard.com/2008/09/10/palinesque/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Oh, I'd have probably fired Wooten, HAD I BEEN HIS SUPERVISOR.  I used to be a State employee, and I know enough about the system that, as governor, I would have recognized that to fiddle with an employee so far down in the food chain would only invite the questions that have been forthcoming of late.  Not good politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I&#8217;d have probably fired Wooten, HAD I BEEN HIS SUPERVISOR.  I used to be a State employee, and I know enough about the system that, as governor, I would have recognized that to fiddle with an employee so far down in the food chain would only invite the questions that have been forthcoming of late.  Not good politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbbeard</title>
		<link>http://blog.bbbeard.com/2008/09/10/palinesque/#comment-29</link>
		<author>bbbeard</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.bbbeard.com/2008/09/10/palinesque/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Well, curiously, it was "Troopergate II: The Sarah Palin Chronicles" that tipped me in favor of Palin. Sure, I liked the tax-cutting, bridge-killing, jet-on-eBay, moose-killer, Murkowski-slayer stuff, but the fact that she's hell-on-wife-beaters really cinched it for me. 

Did Palin fire Monegan because he wouldn't fire Wooten? I wish it were true. But it appears that the charges that she fired the guy for the thing about the other guy don't appear to be true. The rumor was started by Andrew Halcro, a former political rival. Ever since Halcro's blog energized Palin's (numerous) enemies, Monegan has issued cryptic, carefully calibrated hints of pressure, without actually saying that Palin ordered him to fire Wooten. FWIW, I would have fired Monegan for not firing admitted-screwup Wooten. He tasered his kid and he gets a four-day suspension? Drunk driving? Death threats?

Reportedly Palin actually fired Monegan because he went to legislators pushing for budget increases not approved by the governor's office. I would have fired him for that, too. 

But if the Democrats want to make Mike Wooten their poster boy for fair play in government, well, that fits well with the whole Ayers/Wright/Rezko thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, curiously, it was &#8220;Troopergate II: The Sarah Palin Chronicles&#8221; that tipped me in favor of Palin. Sure, I liked the tax-cutting, bridge-killing, jet-on-eBay, moose-killer, Murkowski-slayer stuff, but the fact that she&#8217;s hell-on-wife-beaters really cinched it for me. </p>
<p>Did Palin fire Monegan because he wouldn&#8217;t fire Wooten? I wish it were true. But it appears that the charges that she fired the guy for the thing about the other guy don&#8217;t appear to be true. The rumor was started by Andrew Halcro, a former political rival. Ever since Halcro&#8217;s blog energized Palin&#8217;s (numerous) enemies, Monegan has issued cryptic, carefully calibrated hints of pressure, without actually saying that Palin ordered him to fire Wooten. FWIW, I would have fired Monegan for not firing admitted-screwup Wooten. He tasered his kid and he gets a four-day suspension? Drunk driving? Death threats?</p>
<p>Reportedly Palin actually fired Monegan because he went to legislators pushing for budget increases not approved by the governor&#8217;s office. I would have fired him for that, too. </p>
<p>But if the Democrats want to make Mike Wooten their poster boy for fair play in government, well, that fits well with the whole Ayers/Wright/Rezko thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aurora_guy</title>
		<link>http://blog.bbbeard.com/2008/09/10/palinesque/#comment-25</link>
		<author>aurora_guy</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 05:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.bbbeard.com/2008/09/10/palinesque/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Fairbanks was a right mess last week with reportage and entourage the other day as Palin came "home."  The Oil Pipeline view point was mobbed as Charles Gibson met with her there.  The lingering hangover of the rally was short-lived, apparently.  By noon the next day, our lives were back to normal with a modest level of chatter, with a few exceptions.

The women at work are universally gaga over Palin's selection as veep candidate.  You'd think there was a second coming or something.  Honestly, their enthusiasm is based entirely on "she's one of us", all without knowledge of her positions on anything whatsoever, save for a few of the embarrassments left behind by the Murkowski administration.

Meanwhile, I've been digging a bit, and I'm pretty well settled that she's potentially bad news for the country.  Not that she has totally outlandish notions of governance or human rights, for example, but I'm beginning to get the feeling she's is a true opportunist rather than a leader.  As I have said before, as governor, she's been OK, but as I see her getting molded into a national figure/cheerleader by the RNC machine, it's scary.  Leadership -- not cheerleadership -- is something this country has lacked for a long time, and we need it badly.

Also, the "Troopergate" problem has only turned up more questions of her judgment.  It seems the entire family, Sarah included, had a major axe to grind with her sister's ex.  On top of the desire to make the guy pay, the whole family also sought many times to make malicious claims serious enough to where he could lose his job.  Even the judge commented that it didn't make sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fairbanks was a right mess last week with reportage and entourage the other day as Palin came &#8220;home.&#8221;  The Oil Pipeline view point was mobbed as Charles Gibson met with her there.  The lingering hangover of the rally was short-lived, apparently.  By noon the next day, our lives were back to normal with a modest level of chatter, with a few exceptions.</p>
<p>The women at work are universally gaga over Palin&#8217;s selection as veep candidate.  You&#8217;d think there was a second coming or something.  Honestly, their enthusiasm is based entirely on &#8220;she&#8217;s one of us&#8221;, all without knowledge of her positions on anything whatsoever, save for a few of the embarrassments left behind by the Murkowski administration.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, I&#8217;ve been digging a bit, and I&#8217;m pretty well settled that she&#8217;s potentially bad news for the country.  Not that she has totally outlandish notions of governance or human rights, for example, but I&#8217;m beginning to get the feeling she&#8217;s is a true opportunist rather than a leader.  As I have said before, as governor, she&#8217;s been OK, but as I see her getting molded into a national figure/cheerleader by the RNC machine, it&#8217;s scary.  Leadership &#8212; not cheerleadership &#8212; is something this country has lacked for a long time, and we need it badly.</p>
<p>Also, the &#8220;Troopergate&#8221; problem has only turned up more questions of her judgment.  It seems the entire family, Sarah included, had a major axe to grind with her sister&#8217;s ex.  On top of the desire to make the guy pay, the whole family also sought many times to make malicious claims serious enough to where he could lose his job.  Even the judge commented that it didn&#8217;t make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lukemeister</title>
		<link>http://blog.bbbeard.com/2008/09/10/palinesque/#comment-24</link>
		<author>lukemeister</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 01:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.bbbeard.com/2008/09/10/palinesque/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Hey, give Matt Damon a break. Some of the &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/billg/default.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;smartest people in the world&lt;/a&gt; are Harvard dropouts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, give Matt Damon a break. Some of the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/billg/default.aspx" rel="nofollow">smartest people in the world</a> are Harvard dropouts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

